Biographical Sketches of the Generals of the Continental Army of the Revolution — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   390
In Category - Modern Nations
Leiter, Mary Theresa Project Gutenberg 2017 Not confirmed
United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Biography Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 39,129
Reading time 171 min
Text sections 92

Biographical Sketches of the Generals of the Continental Army of the Revolution — A Reader’s Guide can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 39,129 words, 2 hr 51 min estimated reading time, and 92 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Biography,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Mary Theresa Leiter's 1889 collection of concise military biographies, tracing the careers of Continental Army generals from appointment through service, wounding, resignation, or death, with a focus on rank, dates, and post-war civilian life.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

nt for him, which he was most anxious to accept, but gave up because of his mother’s opposition. At the age of sixteen he was absent from home for several weeks, while surveying for Lord Fairfax. Delighting in military exercises and outdoor sports, he grew tall, strong, and well proportioned, and at nineteen was chosen adjutant-general with the rank of major, to inspect and exercise the militia of his district. The same year he accompanied Lawrence on a trip to Barbadoes, the doctor having recommended change of climate for the improvement of the latter’s health. Having kept a journal of his surveying trip in 1748, he resumed the record of his life with great minuteness during this his only sea voyage. Returning after four months, he soon after received the sad intelligence of Lawrence’s death, and found himself, young as he was, one of his brother’s executors and the guardian of his only child. Neither the widow nor the orphan long survived; and upon their demise, Mount Vernon passed to George. At this time he joined the Masons. The records of the Fredericksburg Lodge show the presence of Washington for the first time “on the 4th of November, 1752.”

“November 6, 1752, received of Mr. George Washington for his entrance £2 3_s._”

“March 3, 1753, George Washington passed Fellow Craft.”

“August 4, 1753, George Washington raised Master Mason.”

In 1753, the encroachments of the French awakening serious alarm, Governor Dinwiddie of Virginia selected Major Washington to carry a demand, in the name of the English monarch, that the chain of forts along the Alleghany and Ohio rivers should be abandoned. The mission was both a difficult and dangerous one; and failing in its object, active preparations were begun in the colonies for the war that was now unavoidable. In 1754, Washington was appointed lieutenant-colonel of one of the Virginia regiments, and in July distinguished himself by his brave defence of Fort Necessity at Great Meadows, which he was compelled at length to surrender. In 1755, General Braddock, as commander-in-chief of the royal forces in America, invited Colonel Washington to act as aide-de-camp during an expedition having for its ultimate object the reduction of the French forts of Niagara and Crown Point. Ignorant of the modes of Indian warfare, and disregarding his aid’s warning and advice, Braddock suffered a terrible defeat, and lost his life at Fort Duquesne, now Pittsburg. The chaplain of the army being also among the wounded, Washington read the burial service over Braddock at Great Meadows,--the scene of his own capitulation one year before. A second expedition in 1757 against the same fort, led by General Forbes, the advance guard being commanded by Washington, resulted in its capture and the change of name. On the 6th of January, 1759, he was married to Martha Custis, daughter of John Dandridge, and widow of a wealthy planter, John Parke Custis. The wedding ceremony was performed by Reverend John Mossum in St. Peter’s Church, Kent County, and was one of the most brilliant affairs of the kind ever celebrated in Virginia.

“The groom’s suit was of blue cloth, the coat lined with red silk and ornamented with silver trimmings; his waistcoat, of embroidered white satin; his knee-buckles, of gold; his hair was tied in a queue and powdered. The bride’s costume was a quilted white satin petticoat, a rich white silk overdress with diamond buckles and pearl ornaments.”

Among the guests, who were all in full courtdress, were the governor, many members of the Legislature, British officers, and the neighboring gentlefolk. Bishop, a tall negro, Washington’s valet,--to whom he was much attached, and who had accompanied him on all his military campaigns,--stood in the porch, dressed in the scarlet uniform of a soldier of George II. At the conclusion of the ceremony Mrs. Washington and her three bridesmaids drove from the church to her own home, the “White house on the Pamunkey River,” in a coach drawn by six horses, led by liveried postilions; while Colonel Washington and an escort of cavaliers rode at the side. Having retired from the army, he occupied himself with the care of his large estate. Elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses, when he took his seat the Speaker presented him the thanks of the colony for his former distinguished military services. Washington rose, stammered, trembled, but could make no fitting response. The Speaker relieved his embarrassment by saying, “Sit down, Mr. Washington! your modesty equals your valor, and that surpasses the power of any language I possess!” As a delegate in 1774 to the first Continental Congress, during the prayer with which Dr. Duché opened the meetings, Washington knelt while the other members stood. Re-elected in 1775, he was unanimously chosen commander-in-chief on the 17th of June, his commission reading as follows:--

SATURDAY, June 17, 1775.

Mary Theresa Leiter's Biographical Sketches of the Generals of the Continental Army of the Revolution (1889) opens with a tabular list of general officers, recording each man's date of appointment, state affiliation, and fate—resigned, dismissed, killed, or served to war's end. This bureaucratic frame sets the tone for the sketches that follow: each entry proceeds from birth and early military service through Revolutionary commands, wounds, and eventual retirement or death. Leiter's prose is economical, often noting a general's age at death with a phrase like "ripe age of ninety" for John Nixon, or the precise manner of exit—"cashiered," "deserted," "died of wounds." The work is less a narrative history than a ledger of service, where a single sentence can span a career.

Patterns of Exit: Resignation, Death, and Dismissal

The prefatory list reveals a striking pattern: of the major-generals named, nearly half resigned before the war ended, several were dismissed or cashiered, and a few died in service. Charles Lee was dismissed in 1780; Adam Stephen was cashiered in 1777; Benedict Arnold deserted in 1780. Others, like Artemas Ward and John Philip Schuyler, resigned early. Leiter records these exits without commentary, letting the facts accumulate. The sketches themselves reinforce this structure: each biography culminates in a final disposition—retirement on half-pay, return to farming, or a civil post. For example, James Clinton, after sliding down a precipice to escape capture, "took leave of his commander-in-chief and retired to his home." The cumulative effect is a portrait of an army constantly shedding its leaders, whether by choice, incapacity, or disgrace.

Wounds and Their Aftermath

Physical injury recurs as a turning point. John Nixon resigned in 1780 because of "ill health, and the effects of a severe wound received at Bunker Hill." Richard Montgomery was killed at Quebec on December 31, 1776. James Clinton, though severely wounded at Fort Clinton, escaped and continued serving. Leiter often notes the specific wound or illness that ended a career: one general retired "nearly deaf and blind." The body of the officer is a fragile instrument, and the sketches track its decline alongside military campaigns. This focus on physical cost gives the work a somber undertone, even as the prose remains matter-of-fact.

Civilian Lives After the War

Many sketches conclude with a brief account of post-war civilian roles. James Clinton held "various civil positions of trust and responsibility" and died at his residence. Christopher Gadsden, after a commercial career, bought back his estate. The transition from general to citizen is presented as a natural closure, often with a note of local esteem. Leiter does not romanticize these later years; she simply records that the officer "passed the remainder of his life" in a particular town, enjoying respect. This pattern underscores the book's function as a biographical register rather than a celebration of martial glory. The war is a phase, not the whole story.

Leiter's sketches reward readers who attend to the small details: the precise date of a resignation, the name of a wound, the town where a general died. The work is best approached as a reference—a place to verify a commission date or trace a career arc—but its cumulative portrait of an army's leadership is unexpectedly poignant. The generals are not heroes in any grand sense; they are men who served, broke, and went home.

Those old biographies of Continental generals always make me think of the long silences between their campaigns, the patient years of waiting and maneuvering. My mind drifts to another kind of waiting, that quiet wrestling between empires over a railway line in the sand. There is a shared, unhurried patience in both, a chess game played across decades. Rarely have I seen such dedication to detail, such careful accounting of a nation’s reach, as in Turkey, the Great Powers, and the Bagdad Railway: A study in imperialism — A Closer Reading. Both volumes simply kept me company for a good, long while.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks