Eighty-fourth Regiment, Pennsylvania Volunteers (Infantry.) — A Closer Reading
Edition facts
The source record for Eighty-fourth Regiment, Pennsylvania Volunteers (Infantry.) — A Closer Reading measures this digital text at 23,676 words, 1 hr 43 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 19.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “United States. Army. Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, 84th (1861-1865),” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Who was the best-posted man on the news? Who the readiest army talker? Who the general of the camp? The soldier who was not to be found in the place his enlistment called for at the time when his presence would have told the most. It was well for the service that he did not number many.
The good soldier ought not to think it strange, that while in everything he did his duty well, he does not know much of what was done by regiments other than his own, and would be at a loss to name the number of his brigade. Nor must he think that the comrade who stood side by side with him is the only one mistaken as to the occurrences of the day. It would not always be well to accept a soldier of F Co. as a conclusive witness of what took place in E, if there was dispute as to the bearing of the line, or question as to who were the first to advance; and yet, no one will bend the ear more gladly than myself to the recitals of a soldier in fact, because I know he gives us the truth as he believes it. And if from the data thus gathered, I count that his regiment was killed, or permanently disabled, _twice over_, I attribute the outcome to a lack somewhere in the arithmetic, and not to a vice in the teller. And, in this connection, we must not overlook the fact of the years that have rolled by.
Twenty-four years and upward in the circle of time measures the distance of our close, very close, comradeship. Years more than many of us had numbered prior to the beginning, four years before, of the long campaign. The time that preceded and that which has followed, make up the life ordinary. The long four years was the life within the other life. In it was contained the greatest of all wars from the world's beginning--the war against the Rebellion of '61.
Hirelings were not upon either side. It was man against man in the fight. Soldier pitted against soldier. Each individual fighting the issue which so nearly concerned himself. It was the greatest of rebellions against the grandest of governments. If successful, to the world it would have been the greatest and grandest of revolutions.
It was not a conflict forced merely for the perpetuation of slavery. It was the institution of the crown, and not preservation of the chattel, that most moved the men who moved the South from '89 to '61.
One people in Government, and yet in sentiment and practices as far removed as two nationalities.
Forced together for mutual protection, yet from the beginning thoroughly divided in appreciation of the powers of a free Government.
In human direction, it was but a run of time when, as a Government for the whole people, the central power would be called upon to assert itself by the power of might.
Neither of the existing conditions would have won to the United States a constitution for their government such as was fixed upon and has come along, in its working, through all of a hundred years, without a break in any of its provisions. Every line of it, as to matters upon which men could differ, was agreed upon for submission to the States, because necessity admitted of no other course for them, and live. Well was it for stability of government that, when the substance had passed the gauntlet of discussion, the words had been so well placed, that not a letter was found astray when the great test came. No document of State has, or ever will, surpass it in sublimity of thought, arrangement of detail, clearness of expression, or force of power.
In the assertion of the binding powers of this Constitution, the 84th had a part, and _you_ were a part of the 84th.
Your Regiment was to you the command which centred your soldier life. And well content may you be in the fact that its character secured for it a reputation which, to every one of us, has been a thing of just and affectionate pride. I studied that character at a time when I felt it was everything to me. My varied experiences in the several positions in company and regiment, which I occupied, enabled me to found a judgment which has been very clearly and most positively strengthened by every knowledge since acquired. The tenor of that judgment you will gather as I proceed, in an imperfect way, to tell you a part of what you did in three years and nine months of soldier life.
RECRUITING AND ORGANIZATION.
Captain Thomas E. Merchant's address, delivered at the dedication of the 84th Pennsylvania Infantry's monument on Gettysburg's battlefield in 1889, is less a battle narrative than a carefully argued defense of the regiment's right to a memorial stone. The core of the speech confronts a lingering question: did guard duty with the supply trains on July 1–3, 1863, qualify as participation in the battle? Merchant insists it did, noting that at least twenty regiments performed similar duty and that the trains were "an important factor in army organization." The text thus operates as both a commemorative address and a piece of institutional advocacy, weaving together logistical detail, official correspondence, and the testimony of brigade commander General Joseph B. Carr.
A Monument Born from Statute and Reunion
The address opens with the procedural origins of the monument. On June 15, 1887, Pennsylvania passed an act providing for a memorial tablet or monument for each of its commands that participated in the Battle of Gettysburg. A regimental reunion at Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, on September 21, 1887, appointed a committee—including Merchant, General George Zinn, Adjutant Edmund Mather, Sergeant A. J. Hertzler, and Henry L. Bunker—with "full power to act as to design, inscription and dedication." The state designated September 11–12, 1889, as "Pennsylvania Days," with the 11th for dedication by the associations and the 12th for transfer to the state. On August 10, 1889, notices were sent to every soldier whose address was known; 146 comrades attended, coming "from all parts of the State and some from beyond." Merchant notes that the presence of so many veterans, years after the war, "awakened the most earnest feeling" and underscored the reality of the old command.
Guard Duty at Gettysburg: The Regiment's Contested Role
Merchant devotes considerable space to justifying the regiment's place among Gettysburg's honored units. On the night of June 30, 1863, at Taneytown, the 84th was ordered to guard the supply train. Colonel Opp, knowing his men were "averse to such duty," requested a revocation but failed. On July 1, as the train moved toward Emmitsburg, word arrived that the cavalry and First Corps had encountered Lee at Gettysburg and that General Reynolds had been killed. The supply trains were then ordered to report to Westminster. Merchant argues that this duty was "quite as necessary of performance, fully as important, carrying with it as much of possible danger" as the fighting on the field. He points out that at least twenty regiments performed similar guard duty, and that several regiments that wrote "Gettysburg" on their battle flags were no more on the field than the train guards. The address includes a letter from General Carr, who commanded the brigade that included the 84th, confirming the regiment's orders and praising its service.
The March to Pennsylvania: A Race Against Lee
Before addressing the monument itself, Merchant provides a vivid account of the Army of the Potomac's pursuit of Lee's forces into Pennsylvania. He describes it as a race: "From the start to the finish it was a race, but not from the foe." Lee moved on one side of the mountain, Hooker on the other; both crossed the Potomac at different points. The army marched through the night after crossing into Maryland, along a tow-path that was "dark, wet and slippery," with soldiers so exhausted that "at times the nearest comrade on the walk would not be within ten paces to the front or rear." Merchant notes that what had been lost at the start had to be made up, for Lee was "well on toward every Pennsylvania soldier's home." On June 27, at Frederick, Maryland, Major-General Meade was assigned to command the Army of the Potomac, relieving Hooker. This section grounds the regiment's story in the larger campaign and conveys the physical strain of the march.
Merchant's address is best read as a primary document of Civil War memory—a veteran's effort to secure his regiment's place in the historical record. Readers should note how the speech blends personal recollection, official correspondence, and legislative detail to make its case. The excerpts do not include the full text of General Carr's letter or the complete dedication ceremony, so the address's persuasive strategy is only partially visible. The work rewards attention to its rhetorical structure and to the way it transforms a logistical assignment into a point of pride.
I keep thinking about how the 84th Pennsylvania spent their whole Gettysburg guarding supply trains, then had to argue for their stone. There’s something so human in that—wanting a place acknowledged after doing the quiet, unglamorous work. It reminds me of the ache in The Assault on Mount Everest, 1922 — Themes and Context, where effort itself becomes the story. Both feel like monuments to being overlooked, and I find that oddly comforting.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.